Skip to main content
Glama

get_niagara_emitter_runtime_summary

Read-onlyIdempotent

Retrieve a flat summary of a Niagara emitter's runtime settings and counts, including simulation target, bounds, allocation, modules, renderers, and events.

Instructions

Flat readback of a Niagara emitter's runtime knobs and counts.

Returns: { system_path: string, emitter_name: string, sim_target: string, bounds_mode: string, bounds_min: string, bounds_max: string, allocation_mode: string, pre_allocation_count: int, max_gpu_particles: int, local_space: bool, deterministic: bool, requires_persistent_ids: bool, update_module_count: int, spawn_module_count: int, emitter_spawn_module_count: int, emitter_update_module_count: int, renderer_count: int, event_handler_count: int, simulation_stage_count: int }

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
system_pathYesAsset path of the Niagara System.
emitter_nameYesName of the emitter handle.

Schema Changelog

Changes observed during successful MCP inspections.

  1. Changed1 schema field changedv1.2.0
    • changedInput schema / required
      Previous value: -[
      -  "emitter_name"
      -]New value: +[
      +  "system_path",
      +  "emitter_name"
      +]
  2. First observedv1.1.0

TDQS

A3.5/5.0
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already cover read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior, so the description is not required to restate safety. It instead adds real value by disclosing the full flat return shape and enumerating the knobs and counts returned, which compensates for the absent output schema.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Purpose is front-loaded in one sentence, followed by a returns block. Given there is no output schema, listing the returned fields is justified rather than padding. No fluff.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a read-only summary tool, annotations cover safety, schema covers inputs, and the description covers outputs. It does not explain accepted values for fields like sim_target or bounds_mode, but that is a minor gap given the tool's snapshot nature.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% for the two required parameters, so the schema already documents system_path and emitter_name. The description adds nothing about their format or constraints, so baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states a specific verb and resource: 'Flat readback of a Niagara emitter's runtime knobs and counts.' This distinguishes it from heavier siblings like get_niagara_module_stack or get_niagara_emitter_handle_info. It stops short of naming an alternative, so it is clear but not sibling-explicit.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

There is no when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance, and no sibling is named as an alternative. The agent must infer from 'flat readback' that this is a consolidated snapshot rather than a detailed inspection tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Deploy Server

Other Tools