Update A Company Action Plan Template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-read-only (mutating), non-destructive, non-idempotent. The description adds that only supplied fields are changed (partial update) and that it returns the modified object. This is helpful but does not disclose other behaviors like rate limits, authentication requirements, or side effects. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences long and includes the API version and endpoint. It is efficient and front-loads the core action. However, the API information could be separated or made more concise without losing value.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is present, so the description should explain the response structure. It only says 'returns the modified object on success' without detailing fields or potential errors. Also, it does not mention error conditions or prerequisite states, leaving gaps for an agent invoking the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description highlights that company_id and id are required and that only supplied fields are changed, which aligns with the schema. It adds marginal meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update a Company Action Plan Template' and explains that only supplied fields are changed. It uses a specific verb and resource. However, it inconsistently refers to 'Action Plans' plural while the tool is for a single template, slightly diminishing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to update an existing Action Plans' but provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives among the many sibling update tools. No exclusions or context for choosing this tool.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.