List Quantity Logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The annotations already declare the tool as read-only and idempotent. The description adds behavioral context beyond annotations by explaining pagination behavior ('Returns a paginated JSON array', 'page and per_page to control pagination', 'response includes pagination metadata'), which helps the agent understand the output.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at about 5 sentences, front-loading the core purpose. Every sentence adds value: the default behavior, usage guidance, pagination details, required parameter, and API reference. No unnecessary information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's complexity (9 parameters, pagination, date filtering) and the fact that schema covers all parameters and annotations declare safety, the description is complete. It covers default behavior, pagination, and usage context. No output schema exists, but the description states the return type is a paginated JSON array, which is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the baseline is 3. The description adds meaningful context by explaining the default date filtering behavior when no date parameters are provided, and it reinforces the use of pagination parameters. This goes beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool lists Quantity Logs, using the verb 'Returns' and specifying the resource. It provides a specific use case: enumeration for a paginated overview. However, it does not explicitly distinguish this tool from its many siblings, which would be needed for a 5.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains when to use the tool ('when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters') and mentions the default date behavior. It does not explicitly state when not to use it or provide alternative tools, but the guidance is clear and helpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.