Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Delete A Signature

delete_a_signature
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete a signature permanently from Field Productivity records. Provide company ID and signature ID to complete removal.

Instructions

Delete A Signature. Use this to permanently delete the specified Field Productivity records. This cannot be undone. Permanently removes the specified Field Productivity records. This action cannot be undone. Required parameters: company_id, id. Procore API: Project Management > Field Productivity. Endpoint: DELETE /rest/v1.0/companies/{company_id}/timesheets/signatures/{id}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier of the Field Productivity resource
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds 'cannot be undone' which reinforces permanence, but adds little beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive ('cannot be undone' twice) and includes API endpoint info which, while informative, adds length. Front-loads the action but could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple tool with two parameters and no output schema, the description covers action, irreversibility, and required params. Extra endpoint info is helpful. Considered complete given low complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%; description merely repeats required parameters without adding extra meaning or context beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it deletes a single signature (Field Productivity record) and distinguishes from the sibling 'delete_multiple_signatures' by specifying a single id parameter.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates use for permanent deletion of a specified record, implying single use. It does not explicitly exclude alternatives or provide when-not-to-use guidance, but the context of a single-id parameter makes it clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server