Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Create Commitment Change Order

create_commitment_change_order

Create a commitment change order for a project contract using project and contract IDs. Optionally set fields such as title, status, due date; returns the new order ID.

Instructions

Create a new Commitment Change Order. This endpoint currently only supports projects using 1 and 2 tier change order configurations. Pass the record's fields as top-level arguments — they are nested under "change_order" in the request payload for you. project_id defaults to the value set by procore_set_config when omitted. Creates the commitment change order and returns it with its new id (HTTP 201); calling it again creates another record. Failures come back as an error payload carrying the HTTP status — commonly 401 when the token has expired, 403 without tool permission, and 404 when an id does not resolve. Required parameters: project_id, contract_id. Procore API: Construction Financials > Commitments. Endpoint: POST /rest/v1.0/projects/{project_id}/commitment_change_orders

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
paidNoJSON request body field — whether or not the Commitment Change Order is paid
titleNoJSON request body field — title of the Contract
numberNoJSON request body field — number of the Change Order
reasonNoJSON request body field — reason for the change order
statusNoJSON request body field — the status for this Commitments operation
privateNoJSON request body field — whether or not the Commitment Change Order is private
batch_idNoJSON request body field — unique identifier for a change order batch.
due_dateNoJSON request body field — due date in YYYY-MM-DD format
executedNoJSON request body field — whether or not the Change Order is executed
revisionNoJSON request body field — revision Number
paid_dateNoJSON request body field — the paid date in YYYY-MM-DD format
referenceNoJSON request body field — the reference for this Commitments operation
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
contract_idYesJSON request body field — unique identifier for the contract.
descriptionNoJSON request body field — the description for this Commitments operation
enable_ssovNoJSON request body field — whether to enable SSOV on this Change Order. Only applicable to Commitment Change Orders.
location_idNoJSON request body field — unique identifier for the location.
field_changeNoJSON request body field — the field change for this Commitments operation
invoiced_dateNoJSON request body field — the invoiced date in YYYY-MM-DD format
attachment_idsNoJSON request body field — existing attachments to preserve on the response
received_from_idNoJSON request body field — unique identifier for the received from entity.
signature_requiredNoJSON request body field — whether a signature will be required for this Change Order
designated_reviewer_idNoJSON request body field — unique identifier for the designated reviewer. This field is only supported for single-tier projects. Behavior is undefined in multi-tier projects.
schedule_impact_amountNoJSON request body field — schedule impact in days
change_event_attachment_idsNoJSON request body field — list of attachment IDs to attach. These must presently be associated with Change Events.
run_configurable_validationsNoQuery string parameter — if true, validations are run for the corresponding Configurable Field Set.
change_order_change_reason_idNoJSON request body field — unique identifier for the change reason.
request_for_quote_attachment_idsNoJSON request body field — list of attachment IDs to attach. These must presently be associated with Request For Quotes (or their Quotes / Responses).
signed_change_order_received_dateNoJSON request body field — signed Change Order Received Date
revised_substantial_completion_dateNoJSON request body field — revised substantial completion date, only supported for Prime Change Orders on single-tier projects.
custom_field_%{custom_field_definition_id}NoJSON request body field — value of the custom field. The data type of the value passed in corresponds with the data_type of the Custom Field Definition. For a lov_entry data_type the value passed in should be the ID of one ...
Behavior5/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-readonly, non-idempotent behavior, and the description adds rich context: calling again creates another record, HTTP 201 with new id, and common error statuses (401/403/404). Also explains project_id defaulting and automatic payload nesting, going well beyond structured metadata.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is dense and front-loaded, with each sentence conveying purposeful information (support limitation, payload format, defaults, duplicate behavior, errors, endpoint). There is slight redundancy between the opening phrase and the later 'Creates the commitment change order' sentence, but overall it is well-structured and not overly verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness5/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a 31-parameter create tool with a rich input schema and no output schema, the description covers the essential operational context: endpoint, required parameters, project_id default, duplicate creation behavior, return status/id, error handling, and feature limitations. This is sufficient for an agent to correctly invoke the tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description adds valuable semantics: fields should be passed as top-level arguments despite being nested under 'change_order' in the payload, and project_id defaults to the configured value. This clarifies usage without repeating schema field descriptions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Create a new Commitment Change Order' with a specific verb and resource, and includes the exact endpoint. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like update_commitment_change_order or show_commitment_change_order.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides explicit usage context: required parameters (project_id, contract_id), project_id defaulting, and a critical limitation (only supports 1 and 2 tier change order configurations). Does not explicitly name alternative tools, but the create vs. update/show distinction is clear from sibling names.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server