Enable A Person To Log In

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is not read-only, not destructive, and not idempotent. The description adds that it creates a new record and returns the created object, which is consistent. It does not disclose side effects beyond creation, but given the annotations, the burden is partially shared. No contradiction.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat redundant ('Enable a Person to log in' followed by 'perform the enable a action') and includes API endpoint information that could be elsewhere. While it conveys essential info, it could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the 6 parameters and no output schema, the description covers purpose, required params, and endpoint but lacks clarity on the exact return structure beyond 'created object'. It is adequate but not thorough for a tool of this complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description does not need to add much parameter detail. It lists required parameters but adds no deeper meaning beyond what the schema already provides (e.g., conditions for email and password). Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool enables a person to log in after creation, with a specific verb ('enable') and resource ('Person to log in'). It also mentions the action on Resource Planning records and the HTTP 201 response. However, the phrase 'Creates a new Resource Planning records' is slightly confusing as it conflates enabling login with creating a record, potentially blurring the purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It says 'Use this to perform the enable a action on Resource Planning records' but does not contrast with other tools or specify prerequisites or scenarios where this tool should be avoided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.