Create Image Category

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate this is a write (non-readOnly) and non-destructive operation. Description adds that it returns the created object with HTTP 201 on success, but does not disclose other behavioral aspects like permissions or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is fairly concise (4 sentences) but contains some repetition ('Create a new Photos' appears twice). It front-loads the purpose and includes API reference details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given there is no output schema, the description adequately explains the return value (created object on success with HTTP 201). It covers required parameters and the general intent, making it complete for a simple creation tool without complex side effects.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100%, so the schema itself documents all parameters. The description mentions that 'project_id' and 'name' are required but does not add extra meaning beyond what the schema provides for the optional parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates a new 'Photo Album (Category)' for Images, using specific verbs and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tool 'create_image' which creates individual images.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use the tool ('Use this to create a new Photos in Procore') and lists required parameters, but does not explicitly contrast with alternative tools or mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.