Batch Update Generic Tool Items

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations (readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false) are consistent with the description's claim of updating. The description adds that only supplied fields are changed and returns the modified object, but does not disclose behaviors like partial update handling (despite completion_mode in schema).

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is five sentences, front-loaded with the core purpose, and includes a link for more information. Each sentence adds value, though it could be slightly more compact.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers basic usage but does not explain optional parameters like view, completion_mode, or run_configurable_validations. With no output schema, the agent must rely on the input schema for completeness. The link to documentation partially compensates.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description mentions required parameters but adds no additional meaning beyond the schema, such as explaining the completion_mode or run_configurable_validations parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Update' and the resource 'Generic Tool Items', and specifies it updates Custom - Configurable Tools. It does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like batch_update_correspondence_type_items, but the reference to Company Admin > Custom - Configurable Tools provides context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explains to use this tool for updating existing Custom - Configurable Tools and lists required parameters. However, it does not specify when not to use it or mention alternative tools like batch_update_correspondence_type_items.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.