Show A Timesheet

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint and destructiveHint false, so disclosure is redundant. Description adds minimal context: mentions it returns a JSON object and includes the API endpoint. No added behavioral traits beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is brief (3 sentences) and front-loaded with purpose. Includes helpful context like API endpoint and module. Efficient with no wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, so description could mention the structure of the returned JSON. However, as a read-only show tool, the description adequately explains that it returns detailed information. Completeness is sufficient for the operation type.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage for all 4 parameters. The description only repeats 'Required parameters: project_id, id' which is already in the schema. No additional semantic information about parameter usage or format.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states 'Return Timesheet detailed information' and specifies 'fetch the full details of a specific Field Productivity records by its identifier'. It distinguishes from siblings by being a detail retrieval tool, not a list or create tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description lists required parameters but does not mention when not to use it or provide context about alternative tools (e.g., list_timesheets).

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.