Show Recycled Action Plan Template Items

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, openWorldHint=true. Description adds that it returns a JSON object and specifies required parameters, but does not elaborate on behavior such as rate limits, authorization requirements, or what happens if item not found. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is three sentences, front-loaded with the action. However, it repeats 'Action Plans' and includes API endpoint and path details that may not be necessary for an AI agent. Could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Tool has 4 parameters (2 required), no output schema, and good annotations. Description says it returns a JSON object but does not specify fields or structure. Given the complexity (simple read), it's adequate but could be more helpful by describing key response attributes.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all four parameters. Description merely restates that company_id and id are required. It does not explain the pagination parameters or provide usage tips. Therefore, description adds minimal semantic value beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description uses specific verb 'Returns' and resource 'Specific Recycled Action Plan Template Item'. It identifies required parameters and provides API endpoint. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from list endpoints that might also exist (e.g., list_recycled_action_plan_template_items), and the phrase 'Action Plans' in plural is slightly inconsistent.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a use case ('fetch the full details of a specific...'), but does not give guidance on when to use this tool versus other similar tools like list_recycled_action_plan_template_items or show_recycled_action_plan. No alternatives mentioned or exclusions of when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.