Update Company Webhooks Hook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false, destructiveHint=false. The description adds that only supplied fields are changed (partial update) and returns the modified object. It does not disclose other behavioral traits like authorization needs or rate limits, but is consistent with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise, front-loaded with the action, and includes the endpoint for context. Every sentence provides value; no waste.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For an update tool with 7 parameters and no output schema, the description covers the action, partial update behavior, required parameters, and return value. It could elaborate on the return structure, but overall is sufficient.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with detailed descriptions for all 7 parameters. The description only mentions required parameters (company_id, id) and implies partial update. It adds no new meaning beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update) and resource (company webhooks hook). It includes the endpoint and required parameters. It could explicitly differentiate from project-level webhook update, but the title and endpoint path with company_id make it clear.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to update an existing Webhooks' but does not mention when not to use it (e.g., for creating or deleting) or provide alternatives like create_company_webhooks_hook or delete_company_webhooks_hook. No distinction from project-level update.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.