Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Create Checklist Section

create_checklist_section

Create a new inspection section in an existing checklist to organize inspection items by category or area.

Instructions

This is a deprecated endpoint. Use this to create a new Inspections in Procore. Creates a new Inspections and returns the created object on success (HTTP 201). Required parameters: list_id, project_id, section. Procore API: Project Management > Inspections. Endpoint: POST /rest/v1.0/checklist/lists/{list_id}/sections

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
list_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier of the list
project_idYesJSON request body field — the ID of the Project the Section belongs to
sectionYesJSON request body field — section object
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are minimal and not contradicted, but the description repeats 'creates a new Inspections' (likely a copy-paste error). No details about side effects, permissions, or rate limits. The behavioral traits beyond annotations are absent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief but redundant, repeating 'Creates a new Inspections' and mixing 'deprecated' with the main purpose. It is not well-structured: important details (required params) are provided but nested oddly.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Despite having only 3 parameters (one nested), the description fails to explain what the 'section' object should contain or how it differs from an inspection. No output schema exists, and the confusion between inspection and section makes it incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the burden on the description is lower. It lists required parameters but adds no explanation of the 'section' object structure or constraints. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate as schema does most of the work.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose2/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it creates 'Inspections' but the tool is named 'create_checklist_section', causing confusion. The actual purpose (creating a section within a checklist) is unclear. It also notes the endpoint is deprecated, which adds context but doesn't clarify the primary function.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. While it mentions 'deprecated', it does not suggest an alternative endpoint or tool. This leaves the agent without context for appropriate usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server