Show Action Plan Template Approver

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, and non-destructive behavior. The description adds the HTTP method (GET) via the endpoint and mentions 'Returns a JSON object', which is consistent. No additional rates, auth, or hidden effects are disclosed, but annotations cover the safety profile.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences that efficiently state purpose, usage, and context. No redundant information. Could be slightly more structured, but overall concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, but the description does not explain the response structure beyond 'JSON object'. The inclusion of page/per_page parameters in the schema is not addressed, which could confuse since this is a 'show' endpoint that returns a single item. Missing details about what fields the response contains.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description repeats required parameters but adds no new meaning beyond indicating they are required. No additional semantics are provided.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool returns an Action Plan Template Approver, using a specific verb and resource. There is a minor inconsistency in referring to 'Action Plans' (plural) instead of 'Action Plan Template Approver', but the intent is clear. Siblings like list_action_plan_template_approvers and create_action_plan_template_approver exist, but the description distinguishes by specifying 'fetch the full details of a specific' item.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to fetch the full details' and lists required parameters, but it provides no guidance on when not to use this tool or alternatives (e.g., list tool, other show tools). It lacks exclusions or context for decision-making.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.