Show Safety Violation Logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, and the description confirms it returns a JSON object with full details, which adds minimal new insight. However, there is a slight inconsistency: the description says 'single' but the schema includes pagination parameters (page, per_page), which are not explained. This could confuse an agent.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is relatively short (3 sentences plus endpoint info) and front-loads the key action. However, the second and third sentences are somewhat redundant with the first, making it slightly less concise than ideal.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description adequately explains the tool's purpose for a simple read endpoint, given the annotation coverage. However, it does not clarify why pagination parameters exist for a single-record fetch, nor does it describe the return structure in detail. The lack of output schema makes this gap notable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, with clear descriptions for each parameter. The tool description only restates required parameters without adding further meaning beyond what the schema provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Returns single Safety Violation Log,' which is a specific verb and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like list_safety_violation_logs by emphasizing 'single' and 'full details of a specific Daily Log records'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says to use it for fetching full details by identifier and lists required parameters. It provides clear context but does not explicitly state when not to use it or mention alternatives, though the sibling tools imply the distinction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.