List Webhooks Resources

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds that the tool returns a paginated JSON array with pagination metadata, which is useful but does not substantially expand beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderate length and front-loaded with the main purpose. However, it contains redundancy (e.g., 'Returns the list... Returns a paginated JSON array') and could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description mentions return format and pagination metadata, which is helpful. However, it does not explain what a 'Webhook Resource' is (e.g., event types) or provide details about the response structure. More context would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, and the description reiterates that page and per_page control pagination and that project_id is required. This adds minimal value beyond the schema definitions, so the score is baseline 3.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns a list of Webhook Resources for a given scope and mentions enumeration for paginated overview, finding IDs, or filtering. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_company_webhooks_resources' or 'list_project_webhooks_resources', which have similar purposes.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides usage guidance: 'Use this to enumerate Webhooks when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters.' It does not include when NOT to use it or mention alternative tools, but the context is reasonably clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.