Update Dumpster Log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and describe updates as non-idempotent. The description adds useful context: updates are partial ('only the supplied fields are changed') and it returns the modified object. This adds value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is well-structured, starting with the tool's purpose and then providing usage details. It is fairly concise, though the inclusion of API category and endpoint may be extraneous for some users.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple update tool, the description covers the main action, required parameters, and return value. It points to external documentation for attachments. It lacks error handling notes but is adequate for its complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description repeats required parameters (project_id, id, dumpster_log) already in schema and refers to an external link for attachments. It does not add new semantic meaning beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update single Dumpster Log', specifies it updates existing Daily Log records with partial updates, and returns the modified object. This distinguishes it from sibling tools like create_dumpster_log or delete_dumpster_log.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It explicitly says 'Use this to update an existing Daily Log records' and lists required parameters. However, it does not provide explicit when-not-to-use or alternative tools for creating or deleting.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.