Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

create_prime_change_order_batch

Create a batch of prime change orders in Procore to manage multiple construction contract modifications simultaneously, streamlining financial documentation and approval workflows.

Instructions

Create Prime Change Order Batch. [Construction Financials/Prime Contracts] POST /rest/v1.0/projects/{project_id}/prime_change_order_batches

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idYesUnique identifier for the project.
run_configurable_validationsNoIf true, validations are run for the corresponding Configurable Field Set.
contract_idYesUnique identifier for the contract.
descriptionNoDescription
due_dateNoDue Date
executedNoWhether or not the Change Order Batch is executed
invoiced_dateNoInvoiced Date
numberNoNumber of the Change Order Batch
paid_dateNoPaid Date
privateNoWhether or not the Change Order Batch is private
revised_substantial_completion_dateNoRevised substantial completion date
revisionNoRevision Number
schedule_impact_amountNoSchedule impact in days
signature_requiredNoWhether a signature will be required for this Change Order Batch
signed_change_order_received_dateNoSigned Change Order Batch Received Date
statusNoStatus
titleNoTitle of the Change Order Batch
designated_reviewer_idNoUnique identifier for the designated reviewer. This field is only supported for single-tier projects. Behavior is undefined in multi-tier projects.
change_order_idsNoArray of Change Order (PCO) IDs to link to this batch. This field is only supported for two-tier projects.
legacy_request_idsNoArray of Change Order Request IDs to link to this batch. This field is only supported for three-tier projects.
custom_field_%{custom_field_definition_id}NoValue of the custom field. The data type of the value passed in corresponds with the data_type of the Custom Field Definition. For a lov_entry data_type the value passed in should be the ID of one ...
change_event_attachment_idsNoList of attachment IDs to attach. These must presently be associated with Change Events.
attachment_idsNoExisting attachments to preserve on the response
drawing_revision_idsNoDrawing Revisions to attach to the response
file_version_idsNoFile Versions to attach to the response
form_idsNoForms to attach to the response
image_idsNoImages to attach to the response
upload_idsNoUploads to attach to the response
Behavior2/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

No annotations are provided, so the description carries full burden. It states 'Create' which implies a write/mutation operation, but doesn't disclose any behavioral traits: no mention of required permissions, whether this is a destructive operation, rate limits, or what happens on success/failure. The API endpoint format is included but doesn't add meaningful behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is brief (one sentence plus API endpoint) and front-loaded with the core action. However, it's arguably too concise given the tool's complexity - a 28-parameter mutation tool with no annotations deserves more explanatory context. The API endpoint inclusion doesn't add value for agent decision-making.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a complex mutation tool with 28 parameters, no annotations, and no output schema, the description is inadequate. It doesn't explain what a Prime Change Order Batch is, when to create one, what permissions are needed, or what the tool returns. The agent would struggle to use this tool correctly without significant external knowledge.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all 28 parameters thoroughly. The description adds no parameter information beyond what's in the schema. According to scoring rules, when schema coverage is high (>80%), the baseline is 3 even with no param info in description.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states the action ('Create') and resource ('Prime Change Order Batch'), but it's vague about what a 'Prime Change Order Batch' actually is. It adds a category hint ('Construction Financials/Prime Contracts') and the API endpoint, but doesn't clearly differentiate this from sibling tools like 'create_prime_change_order' or 'create_commitment_change_order_batch' beyond the name.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance is provided on when to use this tool versus alternatives. The description doesn't mention prerequisites, context, or exclusions. Given the many sibling tools in construction project management, this lack of differentiation leaves the agent guessing about appropriate usage scenarios.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server