Delete Department

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare destructiveHint=true, so the main behavioral trait is known. The description reinforces this by stating 'This cannot be undone' and 'Permanently removes', adding emphasis but no new behavioral details beyond what the annotations provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description contains redundant statements ('This cannot be undone' repeated twice, and 'Permanently removes' repeated). It includes API endpoint info which adds length. Could be more concise while retaining essential information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation, the description covers the basics: action, permanence, and required parameters. However, it lacks information about return values, error handling, or permission requirements. With no output schema, more context about the response would improve completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema has 100% description coverage, so baseline is 3. The description lists required parameters but adds no additional meaning beyond what is already in the schema descriptions. It does not provide format, rules, or examples.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool deletes a Department (Directory record). The verb 'delete' and resource 'Department' are specific. However, it does not explicitly distinguish from sibling delete tools like 'delete_project' or 'delete_company', though the name and context imply it's for department-level records.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It does not mention prerequisites, conditions, or situations where another tool might be more appropriate. The description only states the action without any contextual usage advice.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.