Clones Daily Logs From One Date To Another Date

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description adds that the tool creates a copy and returns HTTP 201, which aligns with annotations indicating a non-read-only operation. It does not disclose additional behaviors like idempotency (marked false) or rate limits, but the annotations already provide baseline safety information.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise and front-loaded with the action. It includes necessary details like required parameters and API endpoint, though the phrase 'Use this to perform the clones daily action' is somewhat redundant with the first sentence.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, but the description notes a successful HTTP 201 response. For a cloning tool, the description sufficiently covers the behavior, though it omits details about handling duplicates or partial failures.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all parameters. The description merely reiterates required parameters without adding new semantic context, so it adds no value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool clones daily logs from one date to another with specific log types. The verb 'clone' and resource 'daily logs' are explicit, and it distinguishes itself from sibling tools like 'bulk_updates_for_daily_logs' by specifying a copy operation across dates.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description includes 'Use this to perform the clones daily action on Daily Log records' and lists required parameters, providing basic usage guidance. However, it does not specify when not to use the tool or mention alternatives, limiting its guidance for an AI agent.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.