Update Daily Construction Report Log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Beyond annotations (readOnlyHint false, destructiveHint false), the description adds key behaviors: 'only the supplied fields are changed' (partial update) and 'returns the modified object on success.' This provides useful context not in annotations. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three concise sentences front-loaded with purpose, followed by required parameters and API context. Every sentence adds value, though the API endpoint could be in a structured field. It is efficient and clear.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers that it updates a single record, performs a partial update, returns the modified object, and lists required parameters. It includes the API path and Procore category. While it does not cover error conditions or invalid data, it is sufficient for a simple update tool with five parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%. The description lists required parameters but does not add new meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline for high coverage is 3, and the description does not exceed that.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description begins with 'Update single Daily Construction Report Log,' clearly stating the action and resource. It distinguishes from sibling tools like create_daily_construction_report_log and delete_daily_construction_report_log by specifying 'update existing' and 'only the supplied fields are changed.' This is specific and unambiguous.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this to update an existing Daily Log records,' indicating when to use the tool. It implies contrast with creation or deletion but does not explicitly mention alternatives like bulk_updates_for_daily_logs. The context is clear, making it a 4.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.