Retrieve A Single Webhook For Company

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true. The description adds that it returns a JSON object and specifies required parameters and the API endpoint. No new behavioral traits beyond annotations, but the endpoint info adds context. No contradiction with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Three sentences: first states purpose, second explains usage, third gives return value and required parameters plus API reference. Front-loaded and efficient. The API reference line adds marginal value but does not harm conciseness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple retrieval tool with annotations covering safety, the description is nearly complete. It explains purpose, usage, required parameters, and endpoint. However, it does not clarify why optional pagination parameters (page, per_page) exist for a single resource retrieval, which is a minor gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (all 4 parameters described). The description reiterates required parameters company_id and id but does not add extra meaning beyond the schema. The optional page and per_page parameters are not explained further, so no additional value.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves a single webhook for a company using its identifier. The verb 'retrieve' and resource 'a single webhook for company' is specific and distinguishes it from sibling tools like 'list_company_webhooks_hooks' (plural) and 'retrieve_a_single_webhook_for_project' (different context).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to fetch the full details of a specific Webhooks by its identifier,' which implies usage context. However, it does not explicitly exclude cases when to use alternatives (e.g., listing multiple webhooks) or name a sibling tool for comparison. The guidance is adequate but not explicit.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.