List Wbs Codes Filter Options

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations declare readOnlyHint, destructiveHint, idempotentHint, openWorldHint, all consistent with a read operation. The description adds behavioral context: it's a GET endpoint, returns JSON array, supports pagination. It discloses API version and endpoint path, which adds useful detail beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is four sentences and includes some redundancy (e.g., 'Work Breakdown Structure records' appears twice). It could be more concise by combining statements. However, it is not overly long and front-loads the main action.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description should explain the return structure. It states 'Returns a JSON array of available filter values' but does not describe the fields or format. Given the tool's simplicity and parameter coverage, it is marginally sufficient but could be more detailed.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description does not add significant meaning beyond the schema; it merely restates required parameters. No additional guidance on parameter usage or format is provided, making it adequate but not enhanced.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it lists WBS code filter options for a project, with verb 'List' and resource 'Wbs Code Filter Options'. It specifies use cases like paginated overview, finding IDs, and filtering. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling tools like 'list_wbs_codes' or 'list_wbs_codes_filters'.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides usage context: 'Use this to enumerate... when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters.' It also identifies required parameters. However, it does not mention when not to use this tool or suggest alternatives among the many sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.