Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Delete Company Form Template

delete_company_form_template
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently delete a specified company form template. Requires template ID and company ID; this action cannot be undone.

Instructions

Delete Company Form Template. Use this to permanently delete the specified Forms. This cannot be undone. Permanently removes the specified Forms. This action cannot be undone. Required parameters: id, company_id. Procore API: Project Management > Forms. Endpoint: DELETE /rest/v1.0/companies/{company_id}/form_templates/{id}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
idYesURL path parameter — company Form Template ID
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds 'This cannot be undone,' which is somewhat redundant with the annotation. It does not disclose auth needs, rate limits, or side effects beyond the obvious deletion.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is mostly efficient but contains redundancy: 'This cannot be undone' is stated twice. The API endpoint info is useful but adds length. Slight improvement possible.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete operation with no output schema, the description covers the essential context: it is a permanent deletion, requires two parameters, and includes the API endpoint. It is complete enough for the agent to use correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100% and each parameter has a description. The description merely restates required parameters (id, company_id) without adding new semantic context. Baseline 3 is appropriate since schema does the heavy lifting.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose4/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the verb 'Delete' and resource 'Company Form Template', and emphasizes permanent deletion. However, it does not differentiate this tool from other delete tools among the many siblings, so it loses a point.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to permanently delete the specified Forms,' which gives a clear usage context. But it does not provide any when-not-to-use guidance or mention alternative tools for similar operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server