List Punch Item Location Filter Options

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only, idempotent, non-destructive behavior. The description adds pagination details, optional search, and return structure (JSON array). No contradictions. Additional context like endpoint is useful but not critical.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is compact: two core sentences plus required params and endpoint. It is front-loaded with the primary function. Every sentence adds value. Minor redundancy with required params but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description mentions return type but not structure details. However, for a simple filter list tool, it provides sufficient context: purpose, usage, required params, and API reference. Good enough for agent understanding.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with each parameter having a description. The description reiterates required parameters and groups pagination/search parameters, but does not add new meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns locations associated with punch items with pagination and search. It differentiates from sibling filter option tools by specifying it's for punch list locations. The phrase 'Returns a JSON array of available filter values for Punch List records' precisely defines purpose.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises using it 'when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters.' This provides clear context, though it does not explicitly mention when not to use it or list alternatives like other filter option tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.