Update Plan Revision Log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate mutation. Description adds that only supplied fields are changed (PATCH behavior) and returns modified object. It also notes attachment upload requires multipart/form-data. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is somewhat lengthy, includes redundant phrasing ('Updates... and returns...') and a markdown link. Could be more streamlined while preserving key details.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema provided; description only notes return of modified object. Lacks error handling or authentication details. Schema covers parameters well, but overall completeness is adequate.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so description adds marginal value. It lists required parameters and mentions attachment multipart details, but most parameter info is already in schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'Update single Plan Revision Log' and specifies it updates existing Daily Log records, only changing supplied fields. It distinguishes from siblings like create, show, delete, and list.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to update an existing Daily Log records' but does not provide explicit when-to-use vs alternatives, prerequisites, or exclusions. Sibling context implies usage, but no direct guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.