Delete Action Plan Receiver Signature

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description reinforces the destructive nature ('cannot be undone') beyond the annotation's destructiveHint=true. However, it does not mention idempotency despite idempotentHint=true, nor auth needs or rate limits. Provides basic but limited additional context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is repetitive, stating 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' multiple times. It includes unnecessary API endpoint details. Could be condensed to a single, clear sentence without redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description lacks explanation of success response (likely 204), error cases, or idempotency behavior. With no output schema, agents need more hints about return values and side effects. Incomplete for a deletion tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds no new meaning beyond the schema. It lists required parameters but merely repeats the schema descriptions. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Delete Action Plan Receiver Signature' and 'permanently delete the specified Action Plans,' but the tool actually deletes a signature, not the action plans themselves. This misstatement creates confusion and fails to accurately distinguish from sibling tools like delete_action_plan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides required parameters and API endpoint details but gives no guidance on when to use this tool vs. alternatives (e.g., delete_action_plan or delete_action_plan_approver_signature). No exclusions or context for selection.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.