Update Equipment Log

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations are present but basic. The description adds that only supplied fields are changed and returns the modified object, which provides some behavioral context beyond readOnly and destructive hints. However, lacks details on authorization, rate limits, or side effects.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately sized (4 sentences) and includes a link and endpoint info. It is front-loaded with the main action but could be more concise by removing redundant phrasing like 'Update single Equipment Log' and 'Updates the specified Daily Log records'.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the presence of an output schema? No, output schema is false. The description states it returns the modified object, which is sufficient for an update operation. Required parameters are listed, and the endpoint is provided, making it complete enough for usage.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100%, so the baseline is 3. The description highlights required parameters (project_id, id, equipment_log) and mentions multipart/form-data for attachments, adding some value over the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action ('Update single Equipment Log') and the resource. It includes the endpoint and API reference, distinguishing it from other update tools in the sibling list by specifying 'Equipment Log' and 'Daily Log' context.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description implicitly indicates usage for updating existing Daily Log records and mentions that only supplied fields are changed. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use or provide alternatives, such as other update endpoints or bulk operations.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.