Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

List Coordination Issue Viewpoints (Legacy + Model Manager, REST V2.0)

list_coordination_issue_viewpoints_legacy_model_manager_rest_v2
Read-onlyIdempotent

List viewpoint mappings for a coordination issue, including legacy BIM viewpoints and model-manager viewpoints. Supports pagination and filtering by primary status.

Instructions

GET collection — returns every viewpoint mapping on the issue. Legacy rows (join has bim_viewpoint_id) use BimViewpointBlueprint view :procore_v0_1 — the same shape as the viewpoints array on the coordination issue resource (CoordinationIssueBlueprint view :extended_with_viewpoint_v0_1): camera_data, sections_data, redlines_data, snapshot, bim_file_id, uuid, numeric id, etc. MM-backed rows (viewpoint_uuid only) are loaded in bulk from M... Use this to enumerate Coordination Issues when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters. Returns a paginated JSON array of Coordination Issues. Use page and per_page to control pagination; the response includes pagination metadata. Required parameters: company_id, project_id, coordination_issue_id. Procore API (v2.0): Project Management > Coordination Issues. Endpoint: GET /rest/v2.0/companies/{company_id}/projects/{project_id}/coordination_issues/{coordination_issue_id}/viewpoints

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
coordination_issue_idYesURL path parameter — coordination Issue ID
viewNoQuery string parameter — when `ids_only`, response body is `{ "data": [...] }`: legacy mappings use integer `bim_viewpoint_id`; MM-backed mappings use UUID strings. Order matches the full list (`position`, `created_at`).
pageNoQuery string parameter — page number for paginated results (default: 1)
per_pageNoQuery string parameter — number of items per page (default: 100, max: 100)
primaryNoQuery string parameter — when `true`, only mappings marked primary on the issue are returned. When `false`, only non-primary mappings. When omitted, all mappings are returned (subject to pagination). Applies to both the fu...
includedNoQuery string parameter — **Ignored.** Legacy list items always return the full `:procore_v0_1` blueprint shape; MM-backed rows always return the full Model Manager viewpoint object.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already provide readOnlyHint true, destructiveHint false, idempotentHint true. The description adds valuable behavioral context: pagination behavior, differences between legacy and MM-backed rows, the 'view' parameter effect, and that 'included' is ignored. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is lengthy and includes many technical details that could be streamlined. While informative, it could be more concise by moving some endpoint information to parameter descriptions. It is front-loaded with the main purpose, which is good.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

There is no output schema, so the description carries the burden of explaining the response. It does so by describing the two possible response shapes (legacy vs MM), pagination metadata, and the effect of the 'view' parameter. It is fairly complete for a list endpoint.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters4/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% and well described. The description adds extra meaning: clarifies that 'included' is ignored, explains the effect of the 'view' parameter, and describes the response shape difference between legacy and MM rows. This goes beyond the schema definitions.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states 'GET collection — returns every viewpoint mapping on the issue', specifying a verb and resource. It distinguishes this from sibling tools like 'get_one_coordination_issue_viewpoint_model_manager_or_legacy' (single viewpoint) and 'batch_get_model_manager_viewpoints_by_uuid' (batch by UUID).

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to enumerate Coordination Issues when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters', providing clear context. However, it does not explicitly state when not to use it (e.g., for a single viewpoint), but the purpose is clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server