Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Bulk Update Contributing Conditions

bulk_update_contributing_conditions

Update multiple Contributing Conditions in bulk for a company. Modifies specified conditions, only supplied fields are changed.

Instructions

Update multiple Contributing Conditions with one request. Use this to update an existing Incidents (only the supplied fields are changed). Updates the specified Incidents and returns the modified object on success. Required parameters: company_id. Procore API: Project Management > Incidents. Endpoint: PATCH /rest/v1.0/companies/{company_id}/contributing_conditions/bulk_update

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
idsNoJSON request body field — the ids for this Incidents operation
activeNoJSON request body field — flag that denotes if the Contributing Conditions are available for use
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare mutating, non-destructive, non-idempotent. Description adds that only supplied fields are changed and returns modified object. No contradictions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Six concise phrases, each adding value. Slight awkwardness in 'update an existing Incidents' but overall efficient.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Covers purpose, partial update, required parameter, API endpoint. Lacks error handling or constraints but sufficient given no output schema and annotations present.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. Description only repeats required parameter and does not add meaning beyond schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Description clearly states verb 'update multiple Contributing Conditions' with resource and scope. Distinguishes from siblings like bulk_update_contributing_behaviors by specifying the domain.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides clear context: use for bulk update of existing incidents. Does not explicitly mention when not to use or compare to alternatives, but the name and context imply when it is appropriate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server