Update Project Webhooks Hook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false already indicate the tool is a non-destructive mutation. The description adds that it uses PATCH and returns the modified object, which provides useful context beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is a single paragraph that front-loads the purpose and includes usage notes, required parameters, and API reference. It is concise and informative without being verbose.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a PATCH update tool with full schema coverage and no output schema, the description adequately explains the operation (partial update, return of modified object). No major gaps identified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema covers all 7 parameters with descriptions (100% coverage). The description lists required parameters but does not add semantic meaning beyond what the schema already provides. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the action (update) and the resource (project webhooks hook). It specifies that only supplied fields are changed, distinguishing it from create/delete/list siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description indicates when to use ('Use this to update an existing Webhooks') and lists required parameters, but does not explicitly mention when not to use or list alternatives. However, the context from siblings makes it clear enough.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.