Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

List Checklist Item Observations

list_checklist_item_observations
Read-onlyIdempotent

Return paginated observations from checklist items on a Procore project. Filter by item IDs, creation or update dates.

Instructions

Returns the Observations from Checklist (Inspection) Items on the Project. Use this to enumerate Inspections when you need a paginated overview, to find IDs, or to filter by query parameters. Returns a paginated JSON array of Inspections. Use page and per_page to control pagination; the response includes pagination metadata. Required parameters: project_id. Procore API: Project Management > Inspections. Endpoint: GET /rest/v1.0/projects/{project_id}/checklist/list_item_observations

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
pageNoQuery string parameter — page number for paginated results (default: 1)
per_pageNoQuery string parameter — number of items per page (default: 100, max: 100)
filters__idNoQuery string parameter — return item(s) with the specified IDs.
filters__item_idNoQuery string parameter — array of Checklist Item IDs. Return item(s) associated with the specified Checklist Item IDs.
filters__created_atNoQuery string parameter — return item(s) created within the specified ISO 8601 datetime range. Formats: `YYYY-MM-DD`...`YYYY-MM-DD` - Date `YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ`...`YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ` - DateTime with UTC Offset `YYYY-MM-...
filters__updated_atNoQuery string parameter — return item(s) last updated within the specified ISO 8601 datetime range. Formats: `YYYY-MM-DD`...`YYYY-MM-DD` - Date `YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ`...`YYYY-MM-DDTHH:MM:SSZ` - DateTime with UTC Offset `YYY...
sortNoQuery string parameter — sort order for results. Prefix with '-' for descending order
Behavior3/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false. Description adds that results are paginated and includes pagination metadata. However, it misstates the response as 'Inspections' instead of 'Observations', which is a behavioral inconsistency. No mention of required permissions or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise but contains an internal contradiction (Inspections vs Observations). The structure is reasonable with key info upfront, but the inaccuracy detracts from its effectiveness.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness2/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema is provided, so the description must describe the return format. It claims a 'paginated JSON array of Inspections' but the tool lists Observations, leaving ambiguity. It mentions pagination metadata but does not specify fields or example structure. Lacks error conditions and authentication context.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all parameters. The description adds minimal value by repeating that project_id is required and that page/per_page control pagination, but it doesn't explain filter parameters or the sort option. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose3/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it returns 'Observations from Checklist Items' but later says to 'enumerate Inspections' and returns 'array of Inspections', creating confusion about the actual resource. The core purpose is clear from the name and title, but the description undermines clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description suggests using the tool for paginated overview and filtering, but provides no guidance on when not to use it or how it differs from sibling tools like 'list_checklist_inspections' or 'list_checklist_inspections_items'. No explicit alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server