Move Action Plan Section

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description claims creation of a new Action Plan, which is inaccurate for a move operation. Annotations do not provide behavioral details, so the description must be clear but is misleading. This is a significant transparency failure.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but contains redundancy ('move action action') and an erroneous statement about creation. It could be more concise and accurate.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description omits important context: what the endpoint returns, how positions are updated, error handling, and prerequisites. With no output schema and minimal annotations, this is inadequate for a tool with 3 parameters.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

All three parameters are documented in the input schema with clear descriptions. The description does not add meaning beyond the schema, merely restating required parameters. Baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description opens with 'Moves the Action Plan Section' which clearly states the verb and resource. However, it later says 'Creates a new Action Plans' which is misleading and contradicts the move operation, reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No guidance on when to use this tool vs. siblings like 'move_action_plan_item_within_or_across_sections'. The phrase 'Use this to perform the move action action' is redundant and unhelpful.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.