Delete Action Plan Test Record Request

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description correctly notes the action is permanent and cannot be undone, which aligns with the destructiveHint annotation. It adds no new behavioral context beyond what annotations provide, but it is consistent and accurate in warning about irreversibility.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately concise but contains redundancy (e.g., repeats 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' twice). It includes helpful endpoint info but could be tightened without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool's specific function and the presence of many similar siblings, the description fails to adequately differentiate it. The misstatement of the resource (Action Plans vs Test Record Request) and lack of explanation about what a 'test record request' is leaves context incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The schema already describes both parameters (project_id, id) with clear definitions. The description merely lists them as required without adding new semantic information. With 100% schema coverage, baseline score of 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states it deletes the 'specified Action Plans', but the tool name specifically targets 'Action Plan Test Record Request', creating ambiguity about the actual resource being deleted. This inconsistency undermines clarity and distingishment from siblings.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description mentions using the tool for permanent deletion but does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus similar delete tools (e.g., delete_action_plan, delete_action_plan_test_record). No exclusions or alternatives are given.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.