Delete Action Plan Item

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds value by emphasizing that the deletion is permanent and cannot be undone, and it provides the API endpoint. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is repetitive, stating 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' twice each. While front-loaded with the tool name, the redundancy reduces conciseness. The endpoint info is useful but adds length.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete tool with annotations and schema, the description covers irreversibility, required parameters, and API context. Lack of output schema info is acceptable. Minor inconsistency with 'Action Plans' vs 'Action Plan Items' slightly reduces completeness.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% (2 parameters both documented). The description only repeats that the parameters are required, adding no further semantic information beyond what the schema already provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The title and first sentence clearly state 'Delete Action Plan Item.' However, the description later says 'delete the specified Action Plans,' causing slight confusion about the resource type. Still, the verb and resource are specific, and it distinguishes from sibling tools like delete_action_plan.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives, no exclusion criteria, and no prerequisites. It only states the tool's purpose without contextual usage cues.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.