Show Company Action Plan Template

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false, idempotentHint=true, so the tool is known to be a safe read. The description adds that it returns a JSON object and provides endpoint details, but it doesn't clarify whether pagination parameters (page, per_page) are effective for a single-item fetch, nor does it disclose other behavioral traits like auth requirements or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise (4 sentences) and front-loaded with the main purpose. Every sentence adds value: purpose, usage instruction, required parameters, API reference. No wasted words.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the lack of output schema, the description should explain what the returned JSON object contains. It only says 'describing the requested Action Plans', which is vague. The tool has 4 parameters and is a simple fetch, but the absence of output details makes it incomplete for an agent to fully understand the response structure.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema has 100% coverage with descriptions for all 4 parameters. The description only repeats that company_id and id are required, which is already in the schema. No additional meaning is added beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it fetches details of a single Company Action Plan Template, using a specific verb ('fetch the full details') and resource. It distinguishes from sibling list tools by indicating it's for a single item identified by company_id and id.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly instructs to use this tool 'to fetch the full details of a specific Action Plans by its identifier', providing clear context. It does not state when not to use or mention alternatives, but sibling tools for listing imply the distinction.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.