Create Catalog

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false. The description confirms creation and return behavior. It does not add further context about error handling, side effects, or permission requirements beyond what annotations and schema provide.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences with repetition ('Creates new Cost Catalog' appears twice). It front-loads purpose but includes unnecessary API version and endpoint details, making it less concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the creation action, return value, and required parameter. It lacks error scenarios, input validation notes, or differentiation from sibling tools like create_new_sub_cost_catalog. Given the tool's simplicity and schema coverage, it is adequate but not complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

With 100% schema coverage, the schema already describes both parameters. The description only reiterates that company_id is required, adding no new semantic value beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a new Cost Catalog and returns the created object on success. It distinguishes from other catalog tools by the specific verb 'create' and mentions the API endpoint. However, there is some repetition and extraneous details (HTTP 201, version) that slightly reduce clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to create a new Cost Catalog records' and notes required parameter company_id. It does not explicitly contrast with sibling tools like create_new_sub_cost_catalog or provide when-not-to-use scenarios, leaving implied guidance.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.