Find Configurable Field Set By Index

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true. The description adds that it returns a template with null ID on not found and mentions pagination, but the inconsistency between returning a single item and a paginated array is confusing. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is moderately concise but includes redundant API endpoint details and a confusing 'paginated JSON array' statement. The first sentence is clear, but overall structure could be tighter.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The description covers the 'not found' behavior and pagination, but does not explain what the 'index' means or how the parameters map to finding a specific field set. The ambiguity between single item and array is a gap.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%: all parameters have descriptions. The description reiterates required parameters and pagination but adds no meaningful semantic information beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it returns details for a specified Configurable Field Set or a template with ID null if not found. However, the mention of 'paginated JSON array' introduces ambiguity about whether it returns a single item or list, slightly reducing clarity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description does not provide guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like list_configurable_field_sets or show_configurable_field_set. It only says 'use this to read information,' which is not specific enough to differentiate.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.