Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Delete Project Webhooks Hook

delete_project_webhooks_hook
DestructiveIdempotent

Delete a specific webhook hook from a Procore project to permanently remove associated triggers. Requires company, project, and hook IDs.

Instructions

Delete Project Webhooks and Triggers associated with hook. Use this to permanently delete the specified Webhooks. This cannot be undone. Permanently removes the specified Webhooks. This action cannot be undone. Required parameters: company_id, project_id, id. Procore API (v2.0): Platform - Developer Tools > Webhooks. Endpoint: DELETE /rest/v2.0/companies/{company_id}/projects/{project_id}/webhooks/hooks/{id}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier of the Webhooks resource
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true, readOnlyHint=false. The description adds emphasis on permanence ('cannot be undone', 'permanently removes'), providing useful behavioral context beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness4/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise with a few sentences, though it repeats 'cannot be undone' twice. It front-loads the purpose and includes endpoint info, but slight redundancy.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the delete operation, schema covers parameters, annotations cover destructiveness, and no output schema is needed. The description adds API endpoint and required params, making it fairly complete for agent invocation.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema description coverage is 100% with detailed parameter descriptions. The description mentions required parameters but adds no additional semantics beyond what the schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool deletes project webhooks hooks, using a specific verb 'Delete' and resource 'Project Webhooks Hook'. It distinguishes from sibling creation/update tools and mentions the Procore API v2.0 endpoint.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines4/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description explicitly says 'Use this to permanently delete the specified Webhooks' and notes that the action cannot be undone. It does not provide when-not-to-use or alternative tools, but the context is clear.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server