Get Workflow Preset (Project)

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate readOnlyHint=true, idempotentHint=true, and destructiveHint=false. The description adds the return type ('JSON object') and the API endpoint, but does not explain the pagination parameters' effect on the response or other behavioral details like authentication requirements. No contradictions with annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is three sentences: first states purpose, second guides usage, third gives API details. It is front-loaded and concise, with no extraneous information.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description covers purpose, required parameters, endpoint, and return type. It lacks detail on the returned object's structure (e.g., fields included) and does not mention error handling or authentication. With annotations covering safety, it is mostly complete for a simple GET tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so each parameter is already described. The description adds value by noting required parameters, specifying they are URL path parameters, and mentioning default values for page/per_page. However, it does not elaborate on how pagination affects the results.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool retrieves details of a specific workflow preset, using the verb 'Get details' and specifying the resource. It distinguishes itself from siblings like list_workflow_presets_project by targeting a single preset by ID.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description advises 'Use this to fetch the full details of a specific Workflows by its identifier,' which provides clear usage context. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from similar tools (e.g., get_workflow_preset_company) or mention when not to use it, missing a chance to guide selection among siblings.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.