Delete Project Type

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate destructiveHint=true and readOnlyHint=false. The description adds emphasis on irreversibility ('cannot be undone') and specifies 'Permanently removes' which reinforces the destructive nature. It also mentions the API endpoint, but that is beyond the core behavioral trait. Overall, adds moderate value beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description contains multiple sentences with redundancy: 'This cannot be undone' appears twice. While it front-loads the purpose, the repetition reduces conciseness. Could be streamlined into one or two sentences without loss.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a simple delete-by-ID operation, the description is adequate. It covers the basic action and permanence. However, it does not mention any potential side effects (e.g., impact on associated resources) or error conditions. No output schema exists, so the return value is not described. Slightly incomplete but acceptable.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

The input schema provides 100% coverage with descriptions for both parameters. The description repeats 'Required parameters: company_id, id' but adds no additional semantic or contextual meaning beyond what the schema already offers. Baseline 3 is appropriate.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool deletes a project type permanently. The verb 'delete' and resource 'Project Type' are specific. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from other delete tools among the many siblings, though the title is unique.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides no guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. It states 'Use this to permanently delete the specified Company Settings' but does not mention any prerequisites, context, or when not to use it. No comparison with sibling tools.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.