Create Checklist

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and non-idempotent. The description adds that it returns the created object on success (HTTP 201), but lacks details about side effects, permissions, or what happens to existing data. With annotations, the bar is lower, so 3 is adequate.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short (3 sentences) and front-loaded with the main action. However, it is slightly redundant ('Creates Inspection Checklist' and 'Creates a new Inspections') and includes API details that may be unnecessary. Still, it is well-structured.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the tool has 5 parameters, 100% schema coverage, and no output schema, the description mentions the HTTP response (201) but does not detail the returned object structure. It also omits information about error handling or additional side effects. Adequate for a simple creation tool.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so baseline is 3. The description lists required parameters (project_id, template_id, list) but does not add meaning beyond the schema. For example, 'list' remains just 'checklist object' without further clarification.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states the tool creates an Inspection Checklist in a specified Project, using verbs like 'Creates' and specifying the resource. It distinguishes from siblings by focusing specifically on checklists/inspections, and provides API context. No ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description says 'Use this to create a new Inspections in Procore' but does not provide when-to-use guidance relative to alternative create tools (e.g., create_checklist_inspection, create_checklist_item_response). No exclusions or alternatives are mentioned.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.