Create Contributing Behavior

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate it's not read-only, not destructive, and not idempotent. The description adds only the HTTP 201 status code and a vague 'returns the created object', which provides minimal extra behavioral context. No information about side effects, permissions, or rate limits.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is short but repetitive; it says 'creates a new Incidents' twice in different forms. It includes API endpoint info which is not essential. Slightly verbose for the content provided.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a create tool with no output schema, the description does not explain what a Contributing Behavior is, its role in Incidents, or any prerequisites. The return value is vague. More context would help an agent understand the domain.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents all three parameters. The description only reiterates required parameters without adding any new meaning, format, or relationship context. Baseline score of 3 applies.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates a Contributing Behavior with a specific verb and resource. However, it contains a confusing error: it mentions 'create a new Incidents' instead of a Contributing Behavior, which is misleading. The purpose is mostly clear but slightly muddled.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like update_contributing_behavior, bulk_update_contributing_behaviors, or other create tools. It only mentions required parameters but does not specify context or exclusions.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.