List Company Webhooks Triggers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already declare readOnlyHint=true, destructiveHint=false. Description adds that it returns a paginated JSON array with metadata, which is useful but does not disclose further behaviors like rate limits or authentication. With annotations, the bar is lower.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Concise paragraph with purpose first, then usage, then parameter details, then API reference. Slight redundancy (return statement twice), but overall well-structured and most sentences are informative.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

With no output schema, description should indicate response fields. It mentions 'paginated JSON array of Webhooks' but does not describe trigger properties. However, the usage guidance and pagination details are adequate for a list tool with clear annotations.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, and description adds value by explaining the role of page/per_page for pagination and response metadata, and listing required parameters explicitly.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that it returns an array of Triggers for a company webhook, using specific verb 'Returns'. It differentiates from sibling create/delete/update trigger tools, though it uses 'Webhooks' loosely in one instance.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Explicitly says when to use: to enumerate with paginated overview, find IDs, or filter by query parameters. Does not provide alternatives (e.g., list hooks) or when-not-to-use, but context is clear for basic usage.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.