Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Delete Bid Form Section

delete_bid_form_section
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently remove a bid form section from a Procore bid package. Provide project, bid package, and section IDs to complete the deletion.

Instructions

Delete single Bid Form Section. Use this to permanently delete the specified Bid Management records. This cannot be undone. Permanently removes the specified Bid Management records. This action cannot be undone. Required parameters: project_id, bid_package_id, bid_form_section_id. Procore API: Preconstruction > Bid Management. Endpoint: DELETE /rest/v1.0/projects/{project_id}/bid_packages/{bid_package_id}/bid_form_sections/{bid_form_section_id}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
bid_package_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier of the bid package
bid_form_section_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier of the bid form section
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already mark destructiveHint=true. The description reinforces irreversibility ('cannot be undone') and adds the API endpoint context, going beyond the annotation with explicit warnings.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is somewhat repetitive, stating 'permanently delete' and 'cannot be undone' twice each. While front-loaded with the action, it could be more concise.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness4/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a delete tool with no output schema, the description adequately covers the action, endpoint, and required parameters. It provides sufficient context for an agent to invoke the tool correctly.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100%, so the schema already documents parameters. The description merely repeats them as required, adding no new semantic information such as value formats or constraints.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it deletes a single 'Bid Form Section', specifying the exact resource. It distinguishes from siblings like delete_bid_form and delete_bid_form_item by targeting the section level.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines3/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It indicates to use for permanent deletion and lists required parameters, but does not provide explicit guidance on when not to use or suggest alternatives like delete_bid_form or delete_bid_form_item.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server