Bulk Update Links

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

The description discloses that the order of links is preserved and that it performs an upsert. It does not contradict annotations. However, it does not mention side effects, error handling, or authorization requirements beyond the endpoint.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is fairly concise, including key behavior, required params, and API endpoint. It avoids unnecessary verbosity, though the mention of 'Project records' is slightly out of place.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given the bulk upsert complexity, the description explains the core logic but lacks details on response format, error handling, and atomicity. The erroneous 'Project records' reduces completeness. No output schema is provided.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

While the schema covers the path parameters, the description adds meaning to the unschema'd body parameters, explaining the upsert logic and position field behavior. This adds value beyond the schema, which only lists company_id and project_id.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states that the tool creates and updates multiple Home Links on a project, with a specific logic based on present and missing ID. It distinguishes the resource (Home Links) from other bulk_update tools.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description lacks explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives like 'update_link' or other bulk updates. It misstates 'update an existing Project records' which is confusing and not accurate. No when-not or alternative usage is provided.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.