Create Company Webhooks Triggers

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate it is a write operation (readOnlyHint=false) and not idempotent. The description adds that it returns HTTP 201 on success and includes the API version, but it does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as permissions, rate limits, or what happens if a trigger already exists. It adds minimal value beyond the annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is concise at three sentences, front-loading the purpose and including relevant API details. There is no unnecessary wording, making it efficient for an AI agent to parse.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

For a creation tool with full schema coverage and annotations, the description is adequate. However, it lacks explanation of what a trigger is, the relationship to hooks, or constraints on resource_name and event_type values. Since there is no output schema, the description could also detail the response structure more, but it is minimally complete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema coverage is 100% with descriptions for each parameter. The description merely reiterates the required parameter names without adding further meaning, constraints, or examples. It does not improve understanding beyond the schema.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description clearly states it creates triggers for a company webhook, specifying the API endpoint and required parameters. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'bulk_create_company_webhooks_triggers', which creates multiple triggers, leaving room for ambiguity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

The description provides a general usage statement ('Use this to create a new Webhooks in Procore') and lists required parameters, but it does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like bulk creation or updates, nor does it mention when not to use it.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.