Create Punch Item Comment

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Discloses that a successful creation returns HTTP 201 and the created object, but does not go beyond annotations. Annotations indicate readOnlyHint=false and destructiveHint=false, but the description adds no further context on side effects, permissions, or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Description is fairly concise but contains redundant phrasing ('Create a new Punch List records' appears twice). Could be shortened without losing meaning.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Lacks details on return object structure and does not explain the nested comment object. Without an output schema, the description should provide more context on what the created comment contains. Sufficient for a simple create but incomplete for the API complexity.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Description lists required parameters (id, project_id, comment) but these are already in the input schema's required array. Schema coverage is 100%, so the description adds little beyond the schema. No new semantic meaning for parameters.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the tool creates a new Punch Item Comment for a Punch Item in a Project. Uses a specific verb and resource, and distinguishes from siblings by specifying comment creation rather than attachments or other operations.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Does not provide explicit guidance on when to use this tool versus alternatives. Only says 'Use this to create a new Punch List records' without mentioning when not to use or comparing to related tools like add_attachments_to_punch_item.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.