Show Plan Revision Logs

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate read-only and idempotent behavior. The description confirms it returns a JSON object, adding marginal value beyond annotations. No contradictions, but limited additional behavioral context.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

The description is reasonably concise but contains redundancy (e.g., repeated references to Daily Logs) and includes extraneous API metadata. The structure is acceptable but not optimized for quick understanding.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

The tool has pagination parameters inconsistent with a single-record fetch, and the description does not resolve this. No output schema, and the description does not explain what the returned JSON contains, leaving the operation incompletely specified.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema descriptions cover all parameters, but the description reiterates required params without adding meaning. Crucially, it claims 'single' record but includes pagination parameters (page, per_page), creating a contradiction that undermines parameter semantics.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

The description states 'Returns single Plan Revision Log' and provides usage instructions, making the purpose clear. However, there is an inconsistency referring to both 'Plan Revision Log' and 'Daily Log records', and it does not explicitly differentiate from sibling list tool.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

It specifies to fetch full details of a specific record and lists required parameters, giving clear context for use. However, it lacks explicit when-to-use or when-not-to-use guidance and does not mention alternative tools like list_plan_revision_logs.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.