Create Project Webhooks Hook

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Annotations already indicate non-readonly, non-destructive, non-idempotent. Description adds that it returns the created object on success (HTTP 201), but does not disclose additional behavioral traits such as immediate activation, permission requirements, or rate limits. Adequate but not enriched beyond annotations.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Four sentences covering title, usage, required parameters, and API reference. No filler, but could be slightly reorganized for better scannability.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

Given no output schema, the description should explain the return object structure but only says 'returns the created object on success'. Also does not mention the optional parameter destination_headers or any prerequisites (e.g., existing project). The API link helps but the description alone is incomplete.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Schema coverage is 100% with parameter descriptions. Description lists required parameters and the endpoint, but does not add meaningful context beyond the schema, such as valid values for payload_version or namespace, or that destination_headers is optional.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states 'Create Project Webhooks Hook' and describes the creation action with required parameters. However, it does not explicitly differentiate from the sibling tool 'create_company_webhooks_hook', relying only on the title's 'project' qualifier.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

Provides a basic usage directive ('Use this to create a new Webhooks in Procore') but does not specify when to use this tool versus alternatives like listing or updating hooks. No exclusions or context for when not to use.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.