Skip to main content
Glama
TylerIlunga

Procore MCP Server

Delete Wbs Attribute Item

delete_wbs_attribute_item
DestructiveIdempotent

Permanently delete a specified Work Breakdown Structure attribute item from a project. Removes the record irreversibly, requiring company, project, and attribute item IDs.

Instructions

Delete Wbs Attribute Item for a given project. Use this to permanently delete the specified Work Breakdown Structure records. This cannot be undone. Permanently removes the specified Work Breakdown Structure records. This action cannot be undone. Required parameters: company_id, project_id, wbs_attribute_item_id. Procore API (v2.0): Construction Financials > Work Breakdown Structure. Endpoint: DELETE /rest/v2.0/companies/{company_id}/projects/{project_id}/wbs/attribute_items/{wbs_attribute_item_id}

Input Schema

TableJSON Schema
NameRequiredDescriptionDefault
company_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the company.
project_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the project.
wbs_attribute_item_idYesURL path parameter — unique identifier for the Wbs Attribute Item.
Behavior4/5

Does the description disclose side effects, auth requirements, rate limits, or destructive behavior?

Description repeats 'cannot be undone' and 'permanently removes', which aligns with and adds context to the destructiveHint annotation. No contradiction, but does not detail side effects or error conditions.

Agents need to know what a tool does to the world before calling it. Descriptions should go beyond structured annotations to explain consequences.

Conciseness3/5

Is the description appropriately sized, front-loaded, and free of redundancy?

Some repetition of 'permanently removes' and 'cannot be undone' reduces conciseness. Includes useful API endpoint and version info, but could be more streamlined.

Shorter descriptions cost fewer tokens and are easier for agents to parse. Every sentence should earn its place.

Completeness3/5

Given the tool's complexity, does the description cover enough for an agent to succeed on first attempt?

No output schema, and description does not mention return value or error handling. While permanence is clarified, the response behavior is omitted, leaving some gaps for an AI agent.

Complex tools with many parameters or behaviors need more documentation. Simple tools need less. This dimension scales expectations accordingly.

Parameters3/5

Does the description clarify parameter syntax, constraints, interactions, or defaults beyond what the schema provides?

Input schema already provides complete descriptions for all three parameters. Description restates required parameters but adds no new semantics beyond what schema provides.

Input schemas describe structure but not intent. Descriptions should explain non-obvious parameter relationships and valid value ranges.

Purpose5/5

Does the description clearly state what the tool does and how it differs from similar tools?

Clearly states the action 'Delete' and the resource 'Wbs Attribute Item' for a project. Lists required parameters, distinguishing it from sibling tools like 'delete_wbs_attributes' by specifying the item-level granularity.

Agents choose between tools based on descriptions. A clear purpose with a specific verb and resource helps agents select the right tool.

Usage Guidelines2/5

Does the description explain when to use this tool, when not to, or what alternatives exist?

No explicit guidance on when to use this tool over alternatives such as bulk delete or update tools. Assumes deletion intent but does not exclude scenarios or mention prerequisites like authorization.

Agents often have multiple tools that could apply. Explicit usage guidance like "use X instead of Y when Z" prevents misuse.

Install Server

Other Tools

Latest Blog Posts

MCP directory API

We provide all the information about MCP servers via our MCP API.

curl -X GET 'https://glama.ai/api/mcp/v1/servers/TylerIlunga/procore-mcp-server'

If you have feedback or need assistance with the MCP directory API, please join our Discord server